So I find a lovely-looking review blog. The posts are thoughtful, fair and seriously considered. I look up the review policy and … it says ‘no self-published books’.
Today I want to open a dialogue with reviewers. If you have that policy, might you be persuaded to change it? Or to approach the problem in a different way?
I used the word ‘problem’. Because I appreciate – very well – that in making this policy you are trying to tackle a major problem. Your time as a reviewer is precious – and let me say your efforts are enormously appreciated by readers and authors alike. You get pitches for many more books than you can read and you need a way to fillet out the ones that are seriously worth your reading hours. A blanket ban is a way to fend off a lot of substandard material and save you…
View original post 1,510 more words
I wonder how the reviewer is defining “self-published.” What if the author is traditionally published by a small, independent press? What if the author is setting up their own publishing house? As a hybrid-published author, and as a book reviewer, I just think this policy is limiting. Is there a lot of drek out there? Sure, but the same can be said of the Big 5’s acquisitions as well. I am a big believer in supporting quality indie authors — of whom there are a boatload.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I completely agree with you!
LikeLike